International Journal of Multidisciplinary and Scientific
Emerging Research (IJMSERH)

|Peer Reviewed, Refereed & Open Access Journal | Follows UGC CARE Journal Norms and Guidelines|

|ISSN 2349-6037|Approved by ISSN, NSL & NISCAIR| Impact Factor: 9.274 |ESTD:2013|

|Scholarly Open Access Journal, Peer-Reviewed, and Refereed Journals, Impact factor 9.274 (Calculated by Google Scholar and Semantic Scholar | AI-Powered Research Tool | Multidisciplinary, Quarterly, Citation Generator, Digital Object Identifier(DOI)|

Article

TITLE Knowledge Management Practices for Enhancing Organisational Learning and Productivity: an Integrated Framework
ABSTRACT In the contemporary knowledge-driven economy, an organization's ability to leverage its intellectual capital is a paramount determinant of its competitive advantage, innovation capacity, and long-term sustainability. Knowledge Management (KM) has emerged as a critical strategic discipline focused on the processes of creating, capturing, sharing, and applying knowledge to enhance organisational learning (OL) and boost productivity. This research paper investigates the synergistic relationship between KM practices, OL, and productivity outcomes. Through a systematic literature review, the study synthesizes existing models and empirical evidence to delineate the core KM processes—socialization, externalization, combination, and internalization (SECI model)—and their impact on individual, group, and organizational learning cycles. The paper proposes an integrated conceptual framework that links technological, cultural, and structural KM enablers to learning and productivity gains. A mixed-method methodology was employed, combining a quantitative survey of 150 mid-to-large-sized organizations with qualitative case study analyses of two firms renowned for their exemplary KM systems. The results demonstrate a strong positive correlation between the maturity of KM practices and metrics of both OL (e.g., rate of innovation, error reduction) and productivity (e.g., project completion time, operational efficiency). The findings underscore that successful KM implementation is not merely a technological intervention but a holistic strategy requiring a supportive culture, leadership commitment, and aligned organizational structures. The paper concludes by discussing the implications for managers and proposing directions for future research.
AUTHOR Shamala S Assistant Professor, PG Department, Sri Bhagwan Mahaveer Jain First Grade College, Geetha Road, Robertsonpet, K G.F., Karnataka, India
PUBLICATION DATE 2025-12-24 19:16:45
VOLUME 13
ISSUE 4
DOI DOI: 10.15662/IJMSERH.2025.1304019
PDF pdf/2025/10/19_Knowledge Management Practices for Enhancing Organisational Learning and Productivity an Integrated Framework.pdf
KEYWORDS
References [1]. P. F. Drucker, "The coming of the new organization," Harvard Business Review, vol. 66, no. 1, pp. 45–53, Jan. 1988.
[2]. T. H. Davenport and L. Prusak, Working Knowledge: How Organizations Manage What They Know. Boston, MA, USA: Harvard Business School Press, 1998.
[3]. C. Argyris and D. A. Schön, Organizational Learning: A Theory of Action Perspective. Reading, MA, USA: Addison-Wesley, 1978.
[4]. G. P. Huber, "Organizational learning: The contributing processes and the literatures," Organ. Sci., vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 88–115, Feb. 1991.
[5]. A. C. Boynton, "The value of knowledge management: Fact or fad?," J. Syst. Knowl. Manag., vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 1–10, 1999.
[6]. M. H. Zack, "Managing codified knowledge," Sloan Manage. Rev., vol. 40, no. 4, pp. 45–58, Summer 1999.
[7]. I. Nonaka and H. Takeuchi, The Knowledge-Creating Company: How Japanese Companies Create the Dynamics of Innovation. New York, NY, USA: Oxford University Press, 1995.
[8]. M. M. Crossan, H. W. Lane, and R. E. White, "An organizational learning framework: From intuition to institution," Acad. Manage. Rev., vol. 24, no. 3, pp. 522–537, Jul. 1999.
[9]. E. Wenger and W. M. Snyder, "Communities of practice: The organizational frontier," Harvard Business Review, vol. 78, no. 1, pp. 139–145, Jan. 2000.
[10]. A. H. Gold, A. Malhotra, and A. H. Segars, "Knowledge management: An organizational capabilities perspective," J. Manag. Inf. Syst., vol. 18, no. 1, pp. 185–214, Summer 2001.
[11]. J. C. Spender, "Making knowledge the basis of a dynamic theory of the firm," Strategic Manage. J., vol. 17, no. S2, pp. 45–62, Winter 1996.
[12]. A. A. G. A. Al-adaileh, "An evaluation of information technology on the organizational learning process: A case study of Jordan," J. Inf. Knowl. Manag., vol. 8, no. 4, pp. 307–316, Dec. 2009.
[13]. V. Grover and T. H. Davenport, "General perspectives on knowledge management: Fostering a research agenda," J. Manag. Inf. Syst., vol. 18, no. 1, pp. 5–21, Summer 2001.
[14]. K. M. Wiig, "Integrating intellectual capital and knowledge management," Long Range Plann., vol. 30, no. 3, pp. 399–405, Jun. 1997.
[15]. R. M. Grant, "Toward a knowledge-based theory of the firm," Strategic Manage. J., vol. 17, no. S2, pp. 109–122, Winter 1996.
[16]. M. Alavi and D. E. Leidner, "Review: Knowledge management and knowledge management systems: Conceptual foundations and research issues," MIS Q., vol. 25, no. 1, pp. 107–136, Mar. 2001.
[17]. T. O. Jones, "The knowledge management landscape: An overview of key concepts and practices," in Knowledge Management and Business Model Innovation, Y. Malhotra, Ed. Hershey, PA, USA: IGI Global, 2001, pp. 1–10.
[18]. J. Darroch, "Developing a measure of knowledge management behaviors and practices," J. Knowl. Manag., vol. 7, no. 5, pp. 41–54, 2003.
[19]. E. F. McDonough, "Investigation of factors contributing to the success of cross-functional teams," J. Prod. Innov. Manag., vol. 17, no. 3, pp. 221–235, May 2000.
[20]. S. G. Scott and R. A. Bruce, "Determinants of innovative behavior: A path model of individual innovation in the workplace," Acad. Manage. J., vol. 37, no. 3, pp. 580–607, Jun. 1994.